CourtFrame
NBA Game RecaprecapNBA

Pelicans drop 138 at home as offense overwhelms Wizards, 138-118

New Orleans turned a three-point first-quarter deficit into a wire-to-wire surge the rest of the night, rolling past Washington 138-118 on March 8, 2026 at Smoothie King Center. The Pelicans won every quarter after the opening period, stretching separation with relentless scoring across the second half.

James O'Brien
James O'Brien
2 min read

Key Takeaways

  • 1New Orleans Pelicans beat Washington Wizards 138–118 at Smoothie King Center, a 20-point margin.
  • 2The fourth quarter decided it: New Orleans Pelicans won it 36–25, an 11-point swing.
  • 3New Orleans Pelicans led 67–65 at the break and never gave the lead back.
  • 4The two teams combined for 256 points.

New Orleans didn’t win pretty early — it won loud late.

The Pelicans (21-45) outgunned the Washington Wizards (16-47) 138-118 on Sunday night at Smoothie King Center, flipping a first-quarter hole into a runaway by steadily cranking up the offensive pressure in each of the final three periods.

How it happened

Washington came out with pace and points, taking the opening quarter 35-32. That was the Wizards’ best punch — and the last time the game felt like it might stay within striking distance.

New Orleans answered immediately in the second, winning the quarter 35-30 to take a 67-65 halftime lead. From there, the Pelicans’ scoring profile only got more punishing: 35 points in the third and 36 in the fourth, turning a two-point edge at the break into a 20-point win.

Turning point: the post-halftime squeeze

The game pivoted in the third quarter. New Orleans matched its second-quarter output (35) while holding Washington to 28, creating the first real cushion and forcing the Wizards to chase offense for the rest of the night. By the time the fourth quarter arrived, the Pelicans had already established control — then widened it again with a 36-25 closing frame.

Ball movement, but New Orleans finished the job

Both teams generated offense through passing. Washington finished with 27 assists, while New Orleans posted 25. The difference was what happened after the ball moved: New Orleans kept stacking high-scoring quarters after halftime, while Washington’s output slid from 35 in the first to 25 in the fourth.

What it means going forward

For New Orleans, this was the cleanest kind of win in a difficult season: a steady climb from a slow start into a dominant finish, powered by consistent quarter-to-quarter scoring growth (32, 35, 35, 36). The Pelicans will look to bottle that second-half edge — the ability to raise their scoring level after the break — as they try to build momentum from a 21-45 record and a WLWLL stretch coming in.

For Washington, the loss extends a rough run (LLLLL entering the night). The Wizards showed early offensive spark, but couldn’t sustain it across four quarters, especially once New Orleans seized the lead late in the second and never gave it back.

Final

Pelicans 138, Wizards 118

Quarter-by-quarter

WAS: 35 | 30 | 28 | 25 — 118
NOP: 32 | 35 | 35 | 36 — 138

Game Data

Quarter-by-quarter score, Washington Wizards at New Orleans Pelicans
TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Washington Wizards35302825118
New Orleans Pelicans32353536138
Date
March 8, 2026
Competition
NBA
Venue
Smoothie King Center
Status
Game Finished

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score of Washington Wizards vs New Orleans Pelicans?

New Orleans Pelicans won 138–118, played on March 8, 2026 at Smoothie King Center.

Who won Washington Wizards vs New Orleans Pelicans?

New Orleans Pelicans, by 20 points in the NBA.

Which quarter decided Washington Wizards vs New Orleans Pelicans?

The fourth quarter. New Orleans Pelicans won it 36–25, the largest swing of the game at 11 points.

Where was Washington Wizards vs New Orleans Pelicans played?

Smoothie King Center, a NBA fixture.

Data Official basketball data feed (ref. 470404)

How this was written Drafted by CourtFrame's generative model from the official statistical feed for this game, then published under editorial review. Editorial policy