CourtFrame
Pricing

Memphis Grizzlies vs Minnesota Timberwolves — 114:131, NBA

NBA
Sunday, February 1, 2026 • FedExForum
TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Total
Memphis Grizzlies21283035114
Minnesota Timberwolves30283934131

Team Statistics

StatMemphis GrizzliesMinnesota Timberwolves
Field Goals44/9047/89
3-Pointers10/3718/37
Free Throws16/2419/24
Rebounds4345
Assists2928
Steals812
Blocks45
Turnovers1414

Box Score

Top scorers

Memphis Grizzlies

PlayerMINPTSREBASTFG3PTFT
C. CowardS27:178633-90-42-2
J. WellsS26:3515615-132-53-6
Jock LandaleS26:017823-71-30-0
Vince WilliamsS22:378403-61-31-2
Ty JeromeS19:3020166-122-76-7
Gregory Jackson27:3719458-111-32-2
C. Spencer25:235352-41-20-0
Olivier-Maxence Prosper21:5913506-91-40-0
J. Small21:367463-91-30-2
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope21:2512215-100-32-3
Totals114432944-9010-3716-24

Minnesota Timberwolves

PlayerMINPTSREBASTFG3PTFT
Anthony EdwardsS38:4433239-211-614-16
Julius RandleS35:09277711-174-51-1
Jaden McDanielsS34:1420428-143-51-1
Rudy GobertS30:4891604-80-11-4
Donte DiVincenzoS17:3811154-73-50-0
Naz Reid30:5420957-146-100-0
Mike Conley17:560320-10-10-0
J. Clark16:325202-30-11-1
B. Hyland12:514141-31-31-1
J. Beringer05:142001-10-00-0
Totals131452847-8918-3719-24

Game Recap

Minnesota powered past Memphis 131-114 behind a balanced scoring attack and a decisive edge from three-point range. The Timberwolves’ perimeter shooting set the tone throughout, as they knocked down 18 threes on 37 attempts, helping them build and maintain separation despite Memphis’ efficient finishing inside. Anthony Edwards led all scorers with 33 points, consistently creating advantages off the dribble and converting in key stretches to keep Minnesota’s offense humming. Julius Randle added 27 points, while Naz Reid and Jaden McDaniels each scored 20, giving the Timberwolves multiple options and making it difficult for Memphis to load up on any single matchup. Memphis got 20 points from Ty Jerome and moved the ball effectively with 29 assists, but the Grizzlies couldn’t match Minnesota’s shot volume and scoring output from beyond the arc. While Memphis shot a strong 34-of-53 from the field (64.0%), the team’s 10 made threes on 37 attempts left a gap that was hard to close, especially as Minnesota continued to answer runs with timely perimeter makes. Going forward, Minnesota can point to the combination of star production and complementary scoring as a winning formula, particularly when the three-point shot is falling. For Memphis, the offensive efficiency and playmaking were positives, but tightening up the three-point differential and finding more consistent perimeter production will be key in similar matchups.