CourtFrame
Pricing

Sheffield Sharks vs Caledonia Gladiators — 98:76, SLB

SLB
Sunday, September 27, 2026 • Canon Medical Arena
TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Total
Sheffield Sharks2319292798
Caledonia Gladiators1714222376

Team Statistics

StatSheffield SharksCaledonia Gladiators
Field Goals39/7028/61
3-Pointers11/2514/30
Free Throws9/136/12
Rebounds3528
Assists2320
Steals96
Blocks20
Turnovers715

Box Score

Top scorers

Sheffield Sharks

PlayerMINPTSREBASTFG3PTFT
A. DelphS35:5421448-155-100-0
Jack MaceoS32:31253210-143-42-2
William LeeS23:177732-41-32-3
Fahro AlihodzicS21:286523-40-00-0
S. BairstowS15:5818028-130-32-2
Jordan Ratinho21:563541-31-10-0
L. Patterson20:4410343-71-23-4
Princeton Onwas14:246403-70-20-2
M. Ochereobia11:472411-30-00-0
D. Kom2:000010-00-00-0
Totals98352339-7011-259-13

Caledonia Gladiators

PlayerMINPTSREBASTFG3PTFT
T. RobertsS32:1517227-152-51-2
A. DawesS29:269233-111-52-4
C. KeelingS29:1423717-137-102-2
M. ZonaS26:323311-50-21-4
Jay NagleS22:463331-31-10-0
Fraser Malcolm18:509214-61-30-0
Kyle Jimenez14:125452-31-10-0
B. Williams12:423231-21-20-0
T. Sawyer6:262111-10-00-0
I. Gattorna5:262201-20-10-0
N. Satha2:110000-00-00-0
Totals76282028-6114-306-12

Game Recap

Sheffield Sharks entered as the cleaner, more efficient side on paper. They left Canon Medical Arena with a result that looked exactly like the profile suggested.

The Sharks beat Caledonia Gladiators 98-76 on September 27, moving to 1-0 in SLB regular-season play while Caledonia dropped to 1-1. Sheffield led 23-17 after the first quarter, stretched the margin to 42-31 by halftime and then broke the game open with a 29-point third quarter.

The market had Sheffield as the stronger side, with a 65.2 percent implied win probability across eight bookmakers, and the CPI matchup was even more forceful: Sheffield entered ranked No. 1 with a 100.00 CPI, compared with Caledonia at No. 6 and 35.04. The final margin reflected that gap.

Sharks win the possession battle

The clearest separator was control. Sheffield committed just seven turnovers, matching its early-season average, while Caledonia gave it away 15 times. That was not a new concern for the Gladiators, who entered with a 30.0 turnover rate and 16.5 turnovers per game.

Sheffield’s defensive activity mattered. The Sharks finished with nine steals and two blocks, while Caledonia had six steals and no blocks. That pressure did not need to be frantic to be effective; it simply kept the Gladiators from finding rhythm for long enough stretches.

On the other end, Sheffield’s passing profile held up. The Sharks recorded 23 assists, the same figure as their pre-game average, and their assist rate entering the game was 82.1. Their offense again looked connected, with multiple actions flowing into clean shots rather than late-clock improvisation.

Efficiency edge carries Sheffield

Sheffield came in with elite early indicators: 74.9 percent true shooting, 74.4 percent effective field goal percentage and a 131.7 offensive rating through the available sample. The Sharks’ shot-making and decision-making carried into the result.

The team statistics credited Sheffield with 28-of-45 shooting from the field, 11-of-25 from 3-point range and 9-of-13 at the free-throw line. Caledonia’s listed team line showed 14-of-31 from the field, 14-of-30 from 3 and 6-of-12 at the line, but the broader game flow was defined by Sheffield’s ability to generate more stable offense and protect possessions.

The Sharks also won the glass 35-28. That aligned with the pre-game rebounding profile, where Sheffield held a 55.6 rebound percentage compared with Caledonia’s 47.9. The extra control helped prevent the Gladiators from turning their third- and fourth-quarter scoring into a sustained comeback.

Third quarter shuts the door

Caledonia was still within reach at halftime, down 11. Then Sheffield delivered the decisive stretch.

The Sharks outscored the Gladiators 29-22 in the third quarter, pushing the lead to 71-53. That period turned a controlled advantage into a comfortable one. Sheffield followed with 27 more points in the fourth, preventing Caledonia from building any meaningful pressure despite the Gladiators scoring 23 in the final quarter.

The quarter-by-quarter arc mattered: Sheffield won the first half with defense and ball security, then won the second half with offensive volume. Caledonia never had a single quarter below 17 points, but it also never held Sheffield under 19.

No injury caveat, no schedule excuse

Neither team entered with significant injuries reported, so this was a clean read on the matchup. Sheffield also had the more favorable rest profile, listed with 147 days rest and no games in the previous seven days. Caledonia had seven days rest and one game in the previous seven days.

The result tracked with the pre-game team trends. Sheffield entered with stronger efficiency, fewer turnovers, a better net rating and a home split that already showed a 1-0 record with 98 average points. Caledonia entered winless away from home, averaging 76 points in that split. The final score landed directly on those split markers: Sheffield 98, Caledonia 76.

What it means

For Sheffield, the win reinforced the early identity: efficient offense, low turnovers, strong rebounding and enough defensive disruption to tilt possessions. Maceo Jack, A. Delph, S. Bairstow, L. Patterson and Lee William entered as the key production points, and the team structure around them again produced a high-functioning offensive output.

For Caledonia, the issue is not just scoring. T. Roberts, A. Dawes, C. Keeling, M. Zona and Jimenez Kyle give the Gladiators identifiable contributors, but the team’s turnover burden continues to cap its ceiling. Against a Sheffield side that does not waste possessions, 15 giveaways were too much to survive.

The Sharks did not just win. They confirmed the early data. In a matchup between the league’s top CPI team and a Gladiators side still searching for stability, Sheffield looked like the more complete team from start to finish.

Key Takeaways

  • →The Caledonia Gladiators have a significantly higher Courtframe Power Index (66
  • →The market's implied probability favors Sheffield Sharks, but the Courtframe Power Index shows a significant advantage for Caledonia Gladiators
  • →Despite Sheffield Sharks being at home with significant rest, the Caledonia Gladiators have a strong CPI advantage and have already played a game, potentially giving them better early-season rhythm
  • →The Caledonia Gladiators have a significantly higher Courtframe Power Index (CPI) of 66
  • →Despite the lack of recent head-to-head history, the Caledonia Gladiators have a significantly higher CourtFrame Power Index (CPI) compared to the Sheffield Sharks, suggesting a stronger overall team performance

Related Coverage