NBA W
Thursday, June 11, 2026 • Gainbridge Fieldhouse
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | OT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana Fever W | 27 | 19 | 27 | 25 | 16 | 114 |
| Chicago Sky W | 14 | 26 | 39 | 19 | 8 | 106 |
Team Statistics
| Stat | Indiana Fever W | Chicago Sky W |
|---|---|---|
| Field Goals | 32/59 | 27/53 |
| 3-Pointers | 7/28 | 7/24 |
| Free Throws | 29/31 | 31/38 |
| Rebounds | 46 | 34 |
| Assists | 22 | 22 |
| Steals | 8 | 6 |
| Blocks | 6 | 7 |
| Turnovers | 15 | 16 |
Game Recap
The Indiana Fever defeated the Chicago Sky 114-106 in a high-scoring WNBA matchup, winning by eight points behind a dominant offensive performance from their core players. Indiana’s efficiency and balance helped separate the Fever in a game where both teams moved the ball well, with each side recording 22 assists. The Fever shot 54% from the field and controlled the glass with a 46-34 rebounding advantage, giving them enough extra possessions to withstand Chicago’s scoring pressure.
Aliyah Boston led Indiana with 34 points, delivering one of the game’s most impactful performances through efficient interior scoring and consistent production in key stretches. Caitlin Clark added 32 points, giving the Fever another elite scoring option and helping maintain offensive momentum. Kelsey Mitchell contributed 19 points, while Lexie Hull added 11, giving Indiana important secondary scoring support.
Chicago remained competitive throughout and shot 51% from the field, but the Sky were hurt by the rebounding gap and Indiana’s ability to generate offense from multiple spots. Both teams made seven 3-pointers, but Indiana’s overall shot-making and work on the boards proved decisive. The Fever’s top-end scoring carried them late as they protected their lead and closed out the win.
For Indiana, the result reinforces the team’s offensive ceiling when Boston, Clark and Mitchell are all producing at a high level. For Chicago, the loss showed competitive shot-making and ball movement, but also highlighted the need to limit second-chance opportunities and improve defensive resistance against elite scorers.
Key Takeaways
- →The Indiana Fever W have a superior Net Rating of 3
- →The Indiana Fever W are favored with a strong implied probability of 77
- →The Indiana Fever have a slight advantage with an extra day of rest and a better home performance record compared to the Chicago Sky's road performance
- →Indiana Fever W is favored due to their superior offensive metrics (ORtg 104
- →Indiana Fever W has a stronger offensive output and a better net rating compared to Chicago Sky W

