Basket Živinice needed a response — and got it when the game tightened. The hosts closed with a 25-17 fourth quarter Friday, pulling away late to beat Orlovik 82-77 at Sportska dvorana Živinice in Prvenstvo BiH regular-season action.

On paper, the matchup leaned Orlovik: a 13-11 record, stronger recent efficiency indicators, and a CPI advantage (72.05 to 49.12, a -22.9 differential). On the floor, Živinice won the possession battle and the contact game, and that combination swung a matchup that had been there for the taking all night.

Game flow: Živinice wins the middle, then the finish

Orlovik set a steady tone early, taking the first quarter 19-17 and matching Živinice again in the second at 19-19. The difference was the stretch around halftime: Živinice’s 24-point second quarter gave them a cushion, even as Orlovik answered with a 22-16 third to keep it within one possession heading to the fourth.

That’s where Živinice separated. Their 25 points in the final period — against 17 from Orlovik — defined the night and turned a close game into a five-point home win.

The deciding margins: turnovers and the stripe

Živinice’s pathway was clear in the team stats:

• Turnovers: Živinice committed 11 to Orlovik’s 14, and paired it with a defensive edge in activity (8 steals to 3).
• Free throws: Živinice went 15/22 at the line, while Orlovik finished 6/10. In a five-point game, that gap mattered.
• Ball movement: Živinice recorded 14 assists to Orlovik’s 8, a sign the home side generated more organized offense when the game tightened.

Orlovik did win the rebounding battle 35-31 and leaned heavily into the three-point line (11/36 from deep). But the overall offensive profile skewed volatile — and when the fourth quarter demanded clean possessions and points at the stripe, Živinice owned both.

How the matchup data played out — and where it didn’t

Pre-game indicators suggested Orlovik’s efficiency should travel. In the available advanced sample, Orlovik carried a +10.9 net rating (118.2 offensive rating, 107.4 defensive rating) versus Živinice’s -1.2 (110.3 offense, 111.5 defense). Orlovik also played at a slower pace (53.6) than Živinice (60.2), typically a profile that can stabilize road games.

Instead, Živinice forced the game into the areas where underdogs can survive: extra defensive events (steals), fewer mistakes, and repeated trips to the line. That formula also aligned with the setting — Živinice had been strong in its home split (3-1, 80 points per game), and it again cleared that mark with 82.

Context: rest, health, and a result that reshapes the night

Neither team reported significant injuries, and both came in with seven days of rest, minimizing schedule-based excuses. Orlovik did have one game in the last week compared to none for Živinice, but the finish looked more like execution than fatigue: Živinice simply delivered the cleaner fourth quarter.

For Živinice (now coming off a win after entering 9-15), it’s the kind of result that doesn’t show up in pre-game CPI differentials — but does show up in the details that decide close games. Orlovik (13-11) had the profile edge coming in; Živinice had the late-game edge when it mattered.