CourtFrame
NCAA Game RecaprecapNCAA

South Florida hangs 109 on UTSA, snaps into gear in 109-88 win

South Florida overwhelmed UTSA 109-88 on Feb. 5, 2026, turning a talent and form gap into a runaway final. The Bulls improved to 15-8, while the Roadrunners fell to 4-18 as their skid continued.

James O'Brien
James O'Brien
2 min read

Key Takeaways

  • 1South Florida beat UTSA Roadrunners 109–88, a 21-point margin.
  • 2The fourth quarter decided it: South Florida won it 61–38, a 23-point swing.
  • 3UTSA Roadrunners led 50–48 at the break, so South Florida won this one after trailing at halftime.
  • 4The two teams combined for 197 points.
  • 5The CourtFrame model picked South Florida at 82% confidence — the pick was correct.

South Florida didn’t let this one linger. The Bulls put UTSA in a deep hole and never let them climb out, rolling to a 109-88 win on Feb. 5, 2026, in a game that quickly tilted from mismatch to track meet.

The result fit the pregame profiles: South Florida entered 14-8 with a LWWWL stretch, while UTSA arrived 4-17 and riding a five-game losing streak. By the final horn, the Bulls had paired that steadier baseline with a ceiling game offensively, clearing the century mark with room to spare.

How the game swung

With no quarter-by-quarter breakdown available, the story is still clear in the margin: South Florida’s 109 points forced UTSA into a pace and scoring environment it couldn’t consistently match. The Roadrunners’ 88 points kept them from being completely erased, but the gap stayed wide enough that any push required near-perfect offense — and South Florida simply had too much scoring volume.

Scoreline that tells the tale

In college basketball, getting to 109 is a statement. South Florida’s offensive output put constant pressure on UTSA to trade baskets. That’s a dangerous equation for a team that entered with a 4-17 record and LLLLL form, because even a “good” offensive night still leaves little margin when the opponent is sprinting past 100.

What it means going forward

South Florida

This was the kind of win that stabilizes a season. At 15-8 now, the Bulls used a high-scoring performance to reinforce their ability to separate from struggling opponents — an important trait as the schedule tightens and style points matter in how teams are evaluated.

UTSA

For UTSA, the loss pushes the record to 4-18 and extends the slide. The 88 points show there was some offensive life, but allowing 109 underscores the bigger issue: it’s hard to compete when the defensive end can’t generate stops, especially against a team confident enough to keep pressing the gas.

Game details

League: NCAA
Season: 2025-26
Date: Feb. 5, 2026
Venue: TBD
Final: South Florida 109, UTSA 88

Game Data

Quarter-by-quarter score, UTSA Roadrunners at South Florida
TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
UTSA Roadrunners05003888
South Florida048061109
Date
February 5, 2026
Competition
NCAA
Status
Game Finished

CourtFrame model, before tip-off

Picked South Florida at 82% confidencepick hit

Published before the game and scored against the result afterwards, hit or miss. How the model works

What the pick was built on

  • Large gap in overall records (14-8 vs 4-17)
  • Recent form advantage (South Florida LWWWL vs UTSA LLLLL)
  • Home vs away context: stronger team also playing at home

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score of UTSA Roadrunners vs South Florida?

South Florida won 109–88, played on February 5, 2026.

Who won UTSA Roadrunners vs South Florida?

South Florida, by 21 points in the NCAA.

Which quarter decided UTSA Roadrunners vs South Florida?

The fourth quarter. South Florida won it 61–38, the largest swing of the game at 23 points.

What does CourtFrame's model predict for UTSA Roadrunners vs South Florida?

The model favoured South Florida with 82% confidence, and that pick was correct. Picks are published before tip-off and scored against the result.

Data Official basketball data feed (ref. 478103)

How this was written Drafted by CourtFrame's generative model from the official statistical feed for this game, then published under editorial review. Editorial policy